From JohnnyB's Crevo Bits blog:

I've heard SO MANY TIMES from evolutionists who complain that there is no difference between micro- and macro- evolution, and that the distinction is an invention of creationists who have their head in the sand. Now, the micro- macro- distinction is often used in evolutionary peer-reviewed literature (some even adding an in-between level -- meso), but the evolutionists who complain about Creationists not publishing in the peer-reviewed journals seem to not have read it. Now that PZ Myers is officially on record about the micro- macro- distinction, can all of the evolutionists who complained about this being a false distinction created by deceitful Creationists to apologize?

Just to clarify -- I don't think that PZ ever made this accusation. But I have been in a great number of evolutionary debates, and in nearly every one where the topic was discussed, they said that micro/macro was a false distinction created by Creationists.

(just to note, depending on how it's defined, Creationists don't necessarily disagree with macroevolution per se, either)

Over at Post-Darwinist, Denyse O'Leary points out that even though some Darwinists object to the term "Darwinist," that is the term they themselves use, of themselves.  Fully documented.