In most species, faithfulness is a fantasy? So former NY Gov. Eliot Spitzer can hardly be blamed? Well, such a conclusion isn't surprising when you view man as just another genus in the great tree of life, bearing no other privileges or responsibilities beyond that granted by his advanced intellect, superiority, and knack for expressing deep feelings for others, even if those feelings are themselves a fantasy. Only a pure-blooded Darwinist would draw conclusions about human ethics by observing the lifestyles of fish, termites, and primates; and unfortunately there are enough of them out there (Darwinists, I mean) to raise the question of whether Spitzer is being judged unfairly--whether, in fact, it's some of those New York laws that aren't quite in step with what Mother Nature intended.

 There's absolutely no indication that God ever intended animals to remain monogamous. But that was his intention for humans, as Jesus said, "from the beginning."

Darwinists are still a bit mad over The March of the Penguins, I'm certain.