Main | Compact galaxies pose a mystery »

Why 19th-century flood geology failed

From Creationism and Baraminology Research News, a report on this paper about why Scriptural Geology (aka flood geology--understanding the rock strata as products of a global flood) was quashed as movement during the 19th century.

GRISDA has a paper by Warren Johns explaining why he thinks that scriptural geology failed in the 1800s. It has some good ideas. Here are his suggestions:

  • Restricting flood layers to higher and higher portions of the geologic record

  • Lack of human fossils in geologic strata

  • The shift away from the hard facts of geology by the scriptural geologists

  • The major journals and educational institutions were hostile to traditional religious beliefs

  • The professionalization of geology made it difficult for part-time geologists (such as the scriptural geologists) to have a voice

  • Liberal theology was replacing orthodox theology as the dominant view
At the end of the paper, Johns makes five "positive" observations about what modern Scriptural geologists can learn from their predecessors' mistakes.

 

Posted on Friday, May 2, 2008 at 07:28AM by Registered CommenterDaniel James Devine in , | CommentsPost a Comment

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>